Why Deconstructionism Must Be Overcome

Let us begin with a simple premise.

Reality is experienced according to perception.

This implies two things: 1) perception of reality is finite and non-encompassing, and 2) it is defined by the transmitted and learned arts of society.

Therefore, our perception of reality is defined by our society, but it is, nevertheless, incomplete.

Let us take an ontical entity, for example, a house.

A carpenter will notice the types of wood and style that is used for the shingle arrangement. A financier will see a possible investment. A former resident will see many happy memories in the front lawn, etc.

Now let us assume that mass man takes on a societal view of the cosmos, transmitted to him via society. A worldview.

Since this worldview has consequences beyond its original meaning, it suggests that the societal worldview will have consequences such as market behavior, tastes, trends, attitude towards sex, crime, etc.

Moreover, we can assume that there will be sociological tremors beyond that of what the individual is aware of, and capable of controlling. This is the beginning of mass psychology.

Inflationary history rises and falls with ideological backbones of the state. This was proven in David Hackett Fischer's seminal work 'The Great Wave.'

Deconstructionism is the most cannibalistic worldview in history. The ontico-ontological status of Dasein is called into being, yet at the same time it is denied vertical transcendence.

There is no going beyond the "I."

This acts as a catalyst which makes our time horizons shallow and individualistic. We cannot plan ahead and see past the nihilistic present, yet we are constantly in a state of anxiety about the past, and the future. Shallow time horizons are the mark of a civilization in decline.

We assume that we are rational creatures, yet our rationality is almost universally a measuring and calculating weapon in our arsenal for the control of resources, and other base desires.

What is the alternative to deconstructionism and nihilism?

The only alternative to nihilism is transcendence.

Since transcendence is an experience, and not a theory, it must be proven to the uninitiated, circumstantially, instead of directly.

This gives rise to the Traditionalist Method which charts analogous symbols across space and time, finding a universal backbone and purpose to Order and to the State.

Therefore, as we go back to Heidegger's ontological critique of Plato, let us for a moment apply the Traditionalist Method to Plato and see what we come up with:

In Platonic doctrine there are two ontological states that exist: 1) the state of becoming, and 2) the state of being.

In Vedic Civilization we find an analogous doctrine. That of 1) Samsara, and 2) Nibbana.

Therefore, there is now circumstantial evidence for the existence of a higher realm, beyond time and space.

In terms of societal structure, in today's world we are tossed to and fro in life under the assumption that we are all equal and that we can all do whatever we want to do, but this doctrine is clearly the source of chaos.

The Traditionalist Method derived a tripartite purpose of society. In Vedic culture: Brahman, Ksatriya, Daisa/Sudra. In Platonism: Philosophers, Guardians, Workers. In Medieval society: Those Who Pray, Those Who Fight, and Those Who Work, etc.

The purpose of the Traditionalist state is the transcendence of its own principle.

The individual exists to fulfill a role above and beyond himself. This gives him purpose in life and a vehicle for transcendence and self-realization. It is only under this assumption that we can delve into the seemingly purposeless ritual of Seppuku.

The implications of a state based on a higher ontological reference point are a wider time horizon for society, class harmony, and a steady ceasing of restlessness, the latter which is the hallmark of modern life.

The Traditionalist Method is superior to deconstructionism as steel is to bronze.

Walt Kowalski and Why President Obama is right to Bow

More from dirtbikerider4 at Myxer

Any white man from a large urban area knows that blacks are not alpha males without the Federal government and the media protecting and promoting their image.

No race submits so easily to brass balls.

Only in this light does the Obama 'Beta Male' behavior make sense:

Blacks don't respect whites in this day and age because we do not respect ourselves enough to defend ourselves.

Blacks bow to races that respect their own dignity.

This was the case with the white man.

The Globalist Manifesto

If you want to know why Moslems that shout 'Allahu Akbar' before murdering American military personal are considered to be victimed of Pre Traumatic Stress, please watch the film Network.

It is the best film on understanding our American Liberal Establishment, replete with cultural Marxism and an empire of low wages and multiculturalism.

Spiritual Uplifting Music (Modern): Von Thronstahl, Saxon, Era

John W. Fountain's Tell-Tail Heart

Mr. Fountain! Massuh Fountain! Don't be o-ffended!

Sometimes I am running errands near home -- buying tires, searching at a home improvement store for a toilet flapper valve; or near my office on Michigan Avenue, purchasing a new mailbox; or on a Loop elevator, or in a downtown lobby. And whether it is bud, buddy, boss, pal, pimp, or playa, all of it offends. For I am none of these.

The offenders most often are white, sometimes younger than me and almost always in service or blue-collar positions. Most often it is the "b" word that is used. It feels too informal a title for perfect strangers, especially when I suspect they call other full-grown men sir.

...

How as black men we were never truly seen as being equal to white men, no matter how much education, money or power we acquired. It's like the scene in the "In the Heat of the Night" when the chief says to Virgil, the black detective played by Sidney Poitier: "You're pretty sure of yourself, ain't you, Virgil? Virgil, that's a funny name for a nigger boy that comes from Philadelphia. What do they call you up there?"

I'm sorry you feel so bad about your encounter with a blue-collar white man that fixed your car. was it really like "In the Heat of the Night?" You may be experiencing post-traumatic stress.

Allow me to let you in on something - I am a white male, racially conscious, and I can guarantee you that being called 'bud' is a relatively endearing term for someone that you meet on the street.

If you want to know other things that whites call you behind you back, I will let you know, but I can let you in on a little secret... it is not polite blacks that we talk about, and we will not talk about you to your face because we will lose our jobs, be sued, and lose our status among our peers.

I will tell you the real reason why you feel belittled - it is your tell-tale heart!

Do you hear it? Thump-thump! Thump-thump!

What is it saying to you?

Is it saying that your status is a farce? A product of affirmative action?

That even in the age of spell check and Microsoft Word editing, your grammar is still atrocious?

You are supposed to write "younger than I," not "younger than me." Don't you see the little green line under your sentence? Can you not just right-click on it and take the suggestion that it gives you?

Did your editor stop correcting your atrocious English out of fear of being called a racist?

Do you cringe after your ego forces you to mention that you think the Egyptians were black? Do the half-hearted smiles from whites offend you when they hear your theories at company dinner parties?

Are you appalled that even rap music comes from the lowest class of white Europeans?

Mister/Master Fountain you are professor of journalism in name only.

You are the product of affirmative action.

You know it, and I know it.

I am just saving you extra embarrassment the next time you decide to write such an article.

Even your liberal friends don't take you seriously.

Clovis I, Father of Europa, Not Charlemagne

Ladies, and gentlemen - it pays to have fantastic court scribes. Ask Einhart, Gibbon, or Norman Davies, all three of which have denied the rightful title of Father of Europa to its rightful heir, Clovis I.

It was the Merovingian dynasty that bridged the gap between the Roman world and the European Medieval.

It was the Merovingian Franks under His Majesty, Clovis I that codified the Salic Law.

It was the Merovingians that established their standard under Martin of Tours, the Hyperborean symbol.

When a line of warriors dies out, a new line arises to revitalize the kingdom.

The Carolingians beginning with Charles Martel and culminating under Charlemagne were nothing but great reformers.

The title of Pater Europa belongs to Clovis I the Merovingian.

The Royal line of Clovis I:

The Successors of Clovis I

Theuderic I son of Clovis, King of Rheims 511-33

Chlodomer, King of Orleans 511-24 son of Clovis I by Chlotilde

Childebert I King of Paris 511-58 son of Clovis I by Chlotilde

Chlothar I King of Soissons 511-61 son of Clovis I by Chlotilde

Theudebert I King of Rheims 533-48 son of Theuderic I

Theudebald King of Rheims 548-55 son of Theudebert I by Deuteria.

Charibert I King of Paris 561-7 son of Chlothar I by Ingund

Guntram King of Orleans-Burgundy 561-92 son of Chlothar I by Ingund

Sigibert I King of Rheims 561-75 son of Chlothar I by Ingund

Chilperic I King of Soissons 561-84 son of Chlothar I by Aregund

Childebert II King of Rheims 575-96, King of Orleans-Burgundy 592-96, son of Sigibert I and Brunhild. He was a minor.

Chlothar II, 584-629, King of Rouen 584, King of Neustria 595, King of Austrasia and Burgundy 613, son of Chilperic I and Fredegund. He was a minor.

Theudebert II King of Soissons and Meaux, King of Austrasia 596- 612 son of Childebert II. He was a minor.

Theuderic II King of Burgundy 596-613, Austrasia 612-13 son of Childebert II. He was a minor.

Sigibert II King of Austrasia and Burgundy 613, son of Theuderic II and a concubine. He was a minor.

Dagobert I, King of Austrasia 623, Neustria and Burgundy 629, Aquitaine 632, son of Chlothar II and Berthetrude (though German historian E.Ewig argues his mum was Haldetrude) d. at Epinay-sur- Seine 19 Jan 638, buried in St.Denis.

Charibert II, King of Aquitaine 629-32, son of Chlothar II and Sichild (born after 618 when Chlothar II married S.).
[Note 1: Charibert and his uncle Brodulf made a bid for Neustria in 629 on the death of Chlothar. Dagobert allotted him Toulouse, Cahors, Agen, Perigueux, Saintes and Gascony, and from there to the Pyrennees = "part of the province of Aquitaine" (Fred.). Toulouse was his capital. Dagobert had Brodulf killed soon after. In 631 Pippin I took Sigebert III to see Charibert who stood godfather to him; in his third year Charibert's army subjugated the whole of Gascony; soon after Charibert died. Charibert had a little son Chilperic, who was killed by Dagobert's men]

Sigebert III, King of Austrasia 632-56, son of Dagobert by Ragnetrude. He was a minor. [Halsall says because Grimoald exec by Clovis II, thus Sigebert III d. 651: thus Childebert (III) c.651-6]

Clovis II, King of Neustria and Burgundy 638-57, half-brother, son of Dagobert by Nantechild. He was a minor. Sometimes he is held to have been king of Austrasia 656-7.

Childebert (III) the Adopted, King of Austrasia 656/7-61/2, (son of Grimoald Mayor of the Palace), adopted by Sigebert III?.
[Note 2: Despite an Austrasian kinglist which gives him 5 years, he is not usually numbered among the kings, and some think he perished with his father Grimoald, who was executed by Clovis II 656/7, and that Chlothar III replaced him. If so, the Austrasians would have had to rebel against the palace in c.662 to replace Chlothar III with Childeric II, his own brother. It seems more likely that in c.662, the Austrasians appealed for a king of Merovingian blood from the Neustrians. Childebert may have survived his father's death, because Clovis II died soon after in 657, and his son Chlothar III was a minor]

Clothar III, King of Neustria and Burgundy 657-73, son of Clovis II and Bathild: a minor under the regency of his mother Bathild (a former slave from England) until 664/5, he was the first of the "do-nothing" kings or rois fainants. Ebroin Mayor of the Palace of Neustria 659-73, 675-80, dominated politics.

Childeric II, King of Austrasia 662-75, King of Neustria and Burgundy 673-5, brother, assassinated by Bodilo in Forest of Livry in Picardy.
[Note 3: Childeric II seems to have upset the Neustrians by using only one mayor, Wulfoald, his duke in Austrasia, for all the kingdoms. He then ordered the beating of a noble frank Bodilo; this punishment was illegal and led to a conspiracy by Bodilo and other Neustrian magnates, Amalbert and Ingobert]

Theuderic III, King of Neustria and Burgundy 673, 675-91, King of Austrasia 687-91, brother: another "do-nothing" king.
[Note 4: When Chlothar III died in 673, Ebroin made his brother Theuderic king on his own initiative without summoning an assembly of the magnates, and even prevented them from approaching him. They rose against them, tonsured both Theuderic and Ebroin, and invited in Childeric II]

Clovis 675-6, supposed son of Chlothar III set up by Ebroin on his escape from prison, fate unknown.
[Note 5: After the murder of Childeric the party of Leudegar of Autun gained the upper hand in Neustria and appointed Leudesius son of Erchinoald at Mayor. Theuderic III was brought out from monastic retreat at St.Denis, and set up as king once more. Ebroin, freed by his friends from Luxeuil, returned to Neustria and set up Clovis as king, but he appears in no kinglist. Ebroin lured Leudesius to his death, then captured and murdered the rest of his opponents, and re- established Theuderic III. As Clovis he does not appear in the traditional kinglists, he is usually not numbered among the kings of the Franks]

Dagobert II, King of Austrasia 676-79, son of Sigebert III, exiled to Ireland 657, made king after the murder of Childeric II, by Austrasian magnates who were opposed to Ebroin: he was assassinated probably by supporters of Ebroin.
[Note 6: Why was Dagobert exiled? It seems likely he was not the son of Sigebert III's queen Chimnechild, who may have cooperated with Grimoald to set up Childebert III. Later she hoped to keep the throne in her own family by marrying her daughter Bilichild to Childeric II, so that the eventual heir would be her grandson. After Dagobert's murder, Pippin II Mayor of the Palace of Austrasia 679-714 dominated Austrasia, and left the throne empty until after the battle of Tertry 687, when he accepted Theuderic III]

Clovis IV, King of all kingdoms 691-95, son of Theuderic III and Chrodochild. He was a minor.

Childebert III, brother, King of all kingdoms 695-711, buried in church of St.Stephen at Choisy-au-Bac.
[Note 7: At his death, areas of southern Gaul began to secede, Savaric in Burgundy, Eudo in Toulouse and Antenor in Provence]

Dagobert III, King of Neustria and Austrasia 711-15, son.

Chilperic II, King of Neustria 715-21, and Austrasia 719- 21, son of Childeric II.
[Note 8: Childeric II had two sons, Dagobert, whose fate is unknown, and Chilperic, who was tonsured as a monk with the name Daniel. When Dagobert III died, a group of Neustrian nobles chose Ragamfred as their Mayor, who made Chilperic king. He opposed Charles Martel Mayor of the Palace of Austrasia, but was defeated, and surrendered 719]

Chlothar IV, King of Austrasia 717-19 (son of Childebert III?) set up by Charles Martel.

Theuderic IV, King of all kingdoms 721-37, son of Dagobert III.

Childeric III, King of all kingdoms 743-51 (son of Theuderic IV or Chilperic II?). Deposed and made a monk with his son Theuderic.

Some of my quotes

Quotes I've made during this week

"Nations are built by people, from blood and soil and they die by people when paper and government has replaced it."

"The takers and the breakers have had enough fun with the makers!"

"Human beings tend to be short-term thinkers, and often follow the path of least resistance."

"The biggest sign of an individual being socialized is when something triggered a knee jerk reaction and when asked at the spot they dont know where their gut feeling comes from.
A second sign of an individual being socialized is when they try to analyze where their gut feeling comes from, which created the knee jerk reaction and their answers are hypocritical or inconsistent arguments. This is a sign of a disconnect, a conditioning. When loud emotional reactions and responses has replaced logic and rationality an individual is acting socialized."

"It is interesting... judging by my values and actions. If I was a NativeAmerican, I would have been regarded as a noble indian warrior fighting for his homeland, existence, freedom and his people. Were I a Zulu I would have been a mighty warrior fighting for what is rightfully mine. Were I a tibeten I would have been a righteous and wise monk fighting the only just cause there is. I would have fought against colonialism, oppression, genocide, cultural-imperialization and I would have been fighting for freedom, for life, for existence and for preservation. But I am neither Indian, Zulu nor Tibetan. And thus I am reduced to satan himself."

"The advantage of a dictatorship is that you and the people know you are being lied to. You can expect it. In a democracy it is not that obvious for the people who has becomed disciples and tools. Nor for those who believe, but do not yet know, that something is wrong. In democracy there is that certain element of uncertainty. In democracy you are given the illusion that you have a choice, that your vote counts and this due to the many different parties and tv channels you know exist. In a dictatorship you know there's in actuality just one media, one party, this allows you to have your guard up. In democracy, the ignorance due to the illusion bring the masses guard's down."

"Make me strong and my enemies stronger. Make the good and the bad and the middle more obvious. I do not want a life with lies, hijacking, backstabbing, conspiracies and deciet. Let them face eachother, let them were colorfull clothes, let them roar, I want a blunt and honest world. A world where it is easy to tell the good from the bad and the bad from the good."

"Ignorance is bliss. Most people aren't ready to be unplugged, they are so helplessly dependent on the system that they will fight you to the death in order to protect it. Does the truth and the wisdom lie in the masses? Or are the masses governed by irrational urges, is he a irrational consumer, walking with blinders speaking half-truths and whole lies?"

"The true warrior is not the man who hate the people infront of him, but he who loves the people behind him."

"The most basic premisse for rationality is inequality. Without inequality you cant have a market of ideas, you cant have competition. Life is a competition of ideas, of peoples, of individuals, of animals, of insects and bacteria. Without inequality you cant have choice or value. One idea cannot logically be defended as being better. Without inequality logic cease to exist."

"Freedom of association, thereby freedom of dissassociation should create voluntarilly, organic that is to say, emergent societies. If a respect to having the right to difference is made and people are free to be voluntarists, there should be little social problems. Too bad most men are caught up in the ping pong game of the state and threaten eachother with the monopoly of legitimate violence, which the state grants the victor."

"History is written by the victors. The defeated is a child no one wants to know of, abandoned, scorned, ostracized, weak, poor & hated. The victor, a child with many aunts and uncles ready to reap the sow of golden opportunities."

"A man only reads and hears what he is able to understand. Widen your interpretation tool and judge things based on the many layers of perspectives you have accumilated."

"History is written by the victors. The defeated is a child no one wants to know of, the victor a child with many aunts and uncles."

- All quotes by Me; AndelimaSephirioth