Five Questions for Non Ethno-Pluralists

1. Are there any circumstances where you would consider the moral imperative of two ethnic groups self-segregating into two different self-governing nations? Such as the Holocaust?

2. Are there any reason why you feel that a certain ethnic group should be eliminated from existence?

3. What is the etymological origin of the word 'racist?'

4. When Group A migrates to the land of Group B, what is the affect this has on wages?

5. Given the warrior spirit of Native Americans, what is the best way to honor their memory? How did they react to encroachment by Europeans?

Jared Taylor on Duty

The Guilt Societies of America and Europe

A guilt society is defined as such: one in which the primary method of social control is the inculcation of feelings of guilt for behaviors that the society defines as undesirable. It involves an implicit judgment on the being (rather than just the behavior) of the individual: "You are an evil person if you would do such-and-so." It also involves creating the expectation of punishment now (when the behavior fails to be kept secret) and/or in the hereafter.

Obviously, the first thought that usually comes to mind is the Catholic society of the Middle Ages.

I would argue that Medieval Catholic Civilization pales in comparison to post World War Two Western countries in the onerous nature of guilt.

In the Middle Ages, the priestly caste allowed indulgences for proper behavior. This was a form of social control.

In today's society we are told not to be guilty for what we do, but for who we are.

The only way indigenous Europeans and Diaspora Europeans can atone for existing is not-existing; that is, dispossession, destruction and annihilation.

This guilt-complex was first launched on the conquered Germans after World War Two. Certainly, few Americans would argue with this given the horrors of the Nazi regime. Of course, the even more barbarous Stalinist regime was never held to such collective guilt against Russians.

Little did Americans know that soon their own government would use these effective psychological warfare techniques against its own populace.



The primary ontological purpose of guilt is reciprocal altruism.

The majority of Euros believe that non-Euros see their acts of guilt and atonement as signs of character and strength.

This is a huge fallacy. They see it, and rightfully so, as signs of weakness.

In order to destroy the cultural superstructure of white guilt, we must as an organized effort, expose the lack of reciprocal altruism and the ill intent among the proponents of multiculturalism.

This is our weapon; our sword in the battle for our lives.

Sweden is Occupied - Communism has hijacked it!

70% of our Swedish journalists vote on the three leftist parties according to socialscientists in Gothenburg. One third of our journalists vote on our communist party, almost as many as on our neo-cons, our folkparty, Christiandemocrates and the center together. Mind you, none of these parties are culturaly right. They're as liberal as it gets and are par on par with the communists in cultural and many social issues.

One of our most famous journalists, Janne Josefsson, told us for an example about how he traveled with Swedish Radio to the SovietUnion during the 70's and heard the editorials give the order to the journalists who went there that they shouldn't report anything bad about the Sovietsystem when they came back home because such comments would help bourgeois interests.

”Of course we've been leaning far to the left.” Cecilia Stegö-Chilò

Journalists connection to the left-wing extremists

Interestinglly when you study the left-journalistic habitus and values is the recurring cooperation with a strongly leftist influenced movement which this makes available. This is because they consider "right-wing extremist violence" as important, but left-wing extremist violence as exceptions or understandable, perhaps even good.



When antifa has been out on a hunting trip for dissidents there's no mentioning of it in the newspaper. The newspapers are silent. There's no written article about how a pregnant women lost her child whilst she was being kicked in her stomach, nothing about the stone who went through the window of a SwedishDemocrat, nothing of how a NationalDemocrat got his car lit on fire, nothing about the two teenagers who was handing out pamphlets got their heads kicked in, etc. The press remains silent. Yet, the press decide to make up stories about people, giving out their names, their age, their addresses so that they can keep on being terrorised and have their careers destroyed. This is the Gestappo in action or the KGB rather. In Sweden we actually have a specific newspaper called the Expo that is state-funded. It's functionality is to do the lefts bidding and find out who oppose the left and our contemporary society and to lump them alltogether and villify them.





"One dead, let's take the rest." AFA from Salem 2008. The Salem march in Sweden is for the Nationalist, Daniel Wretström who is one of many who has gotten murdered by the left and their message can not be interpreted in any other way: Anyone with the "wrong" opinion, must be killed.

In Sweden we aren't allowed to make racialprofiling and the Newspaper will claim that Abdul, Amir and Mohammed from Somalia are Swedes and give them fake profile photos. The left who constantly claims race doesn't matter, doesn't seem to be consisten with their claims when they deliberately blur (pixel) the non-whites photos in the press whilst adding the photoshop effect of bleaching the skin, giving the reader the impression that the alleged Swedish criminal trully is a Swedish man, white male. The opposite of course occours whenever there's white Swedish men who has committed a crime. Then the individual will be overly exposed, name, real, uncensored photoes and it will be written about for days.





Our Swedish journalists have also conspirered to be silent about the problems with multiculturalism and censor the problems of immigration. They've talked about "keeping the lid on", "behålla locket på", regarding the problems of immigration.




The creation of youth-cultures

Anyone who has ever thought about throwing a brickstone at his radio whenever a buch of thirty year old, entertainment journalists, familiarilly och with the use of nothing but the firstnames, claims "Snoop or P diddy" took their time to shoop when he was in Stockholm, or that in all seriousness claimed that a certain band is "a little more ghetto, a little more street", has surely, instinctivelly realized the habitus role in the creation of youth-cultures. The Journalist collective's trait's in other words means that they instinctively consider that it's the multicultural cultural-expression which are youthfull, whilst things such as our Swedish raggarculture (A variant of Americas 40's-50's culture) is considered to be the exception. This influence not the least the most easilly influenced when they in their youth make diverse choices, but also creepy adults who has to speak like the "kids" do.

Once the medias tounge has been silenced, truth will come out, because then people will see reality as it is. I want to see people make decisions without their televisions, I want to hear them speaking just for me, stripped.

The Leadership Institute For The Right

Hat tip to The Leadership Institute for creating an almost perfect organization for combating liberalism. Hell, if it weren't just trying to replace liberalism with more liberalism, I sure as heck would join, immediately.

What we need is an almost exact replica of this institute only not the Ayn Rand/Ronald Reagan liberalism, but of a true Latin Conservatism.

With the way that the liberal media is failing, and with its crisis of legitimacy I figure that the Republican party might need a true challenge in the years to come.

Let us hope that this challenge comes from the right. Let the libertarian free market/open borders crowd have real conservatives to deal with.

We must get our message out that multiculturalism is a Trotskyite wage-lowering moral contrivance.

Our library will consist of: Oswald Spengler, Julius Evola, Patrick J. Buchanan, Felix Sarda, to begin with, not to mention the classics.

I truly believe that we should study the techniques of this organization and create a Latin Conservative/Traditionalist version of it for the true right. This is the logical next step to the purpose behind CFL.

Lord Monckton Explains purpose of Global Warming Movement: Transfer of Wealth To Business, 3rd World and Bureaucrats

It seems that green-guilt Cap and Trade may go the way of the dinosaur as public opinion is marching against it, in the wake of the numerous climate warming scandals.

It makes me sad that we do not have a public figure such as Lord Monckton to fight the beast of the other guilt (white) and its pitiful 'civil rights' priesthood.

The way green guilt was destroyed (relentless truth-telling in the face of a self-serving priesthood) is the same way to destroy the white guilt movement.

The idea of Cap and Trade was simply a tax.

Immigration is a tax, Affirmative Action is a tax, Busing is a tax, and Reparations for Slavery will certainly be a tax. The guilt-inducing priesthood that creates these taxations would make a Medieval Catholic Bishop involved in the Investiture controversy blush.

Mark my words; when the High Priests of Guilt refuse a public debate, as did Gore with Monckton, it hurts their cause, just as when the cowards and the half-literates that run the white guilt racket are hurt by their intellectual and irrational fear of debate over their hypocritical cause.

We must call forward ten Lord Moncktons in order to defeat the Great Beast that is destroying Europe and America.

The way to Fight the Good Fight is to become a fraud buster; Al Gore, Jesse Jackson, Barack Obama; these people are virtually identical to Bernie Madoff in modus operandi and purpose of life.

Exposure to the truth is our sword. Furtiveness is theirs.

Gentlemen, may we Fight the Good Fight!

"An American Indian View on Immigration"

David Yeagley







Note: Nothing is more pleasing to me than watching the liberal disease-carriers writhe in hatred in envy. If you mention a few names to them you will see there faces turn red with pure, utter hatred. Glen Beck, and James O'Keefe, of course, but also David Yeagely, the Comanche classical pianist, professor and conservative commentator. The following is an article he wrote for VDARE in 2002. The message is clear: if we whites are to honor our Native American brethren we must fight with the same warrior spirit as they did, and not give in to cowardly guilt trips for power-hungry left wing hypocrites.


"As an Indian - a direct descendant of the Comanche warrior Bad Eagle, 1839-1906 - I’ve always been fascinated with foreigners. I’ve admired their great courage and determination. They made a perilous journey from their homeland. They learned a new language, and new ways, all in a new land. They brought the world to me.

(“Indian”? Naturally, most tribes prefer their own name. But that’s in their own language, and no one but themselves would know of whom they speak. There is no collective name for “Indians” in any tribal language. The modern term "Native American," created in the 1970s by leftists, is ambiguous. Most Indian people don't use it - only what I call the "university tribe," college-educated Indians led by white radical professors; and the would-be politically correct media. The name we first held, in the white man's eyes, was "Indian." That's what we have been since Columbus. That's what our most famous warriors were called. Believe me, Indians prefer the name “Indian.” It is historically specific, whatever its origin. The name holds the emotional, psychological associations of the warrior. The Left, of course, wants to remove that. Hey, call me savage!)

Playing host to strangers has always been an Indian tradition—as the Pilgrims so famously learned. However, some might say that we Indians were too hospitable for our own good.

America today is making the same mistake we Indians made nearly four centuries ago. America is letting in too many foreigners. And we Indians could end up losing this country all over again. It may come as a surprise to many white people who have been brainwashed by the media to see Indians as the ultimate liberals, but there are few groups in America today who take a dimmer view of mass immigration than the American Indian.

According to ProjectUSA.org, the U.S. population will double within the lifetimes of our children, as a direct result of the massive, uncontrolled influx of foreigners who began flooding our land after passage of the 1965 Immigration Act.

All Americans will suffer. But Indians will suffer most of all.

I’m not talking about competition for jobs, land, housing, energy, water and other finite resources—though these are all important. I’m talking about something deeper. The demographic destruction of Anglo-America will bring the final catastrophe on our people.

What catastrophe? The catastrophe of waking up one day and realizing that white people no longer control this country.

Now why should an Indian care about that? After all, white people are supposedly our enemies.

Well, yes, they were. But, as warriors, we found them to be worthy and formidable adversaries. Defeat is bitter. But when you respect your conqueror, it is a lot easier to swallow.

If Anglo-America turns this land over to blacks, Mexicans, Asians, Middle Easterners and other foreign peoples, for the Indian, it will be like losing this country for the second time. We have had generations to reconcile ourselves to white America. But we do not know these new people who are coming. We fought no battles with them, made no treaties with them, and have no reason to accord them any special respect.

If things keep going the way they are, we Indians could find ourselves bowing down to foreign peoples who never defeated our forefathers in battle—and who certainly never could!

We Indians—especially the more warlike tribes such as my people the Comanches—recognize a kindred spirit in the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. He is like us in more ways than he knows.

The Comanches were one of the most intolerant of all Indian peoples. We had no use for anyone else, white, Mexican or Indian. When we came thundering down on the southwest plains, we took the land we wanted and ran everyone else off. We created the life we wanted, at the expense of other people.

The white man did the same. Only he did it on a grander scale.

In the old days, Comanches were known to honor strength in other people. Comanche warriors even adopted white captive boys, if they happened to show courage and fight.

In many ways, Indians see the white man as a kind of adopted son—naïve, reckless and destructive, at times—but nevertheless cut from the same warrior cloth as we were.

We do not see blacks, Mexicans, Asians, Arabs and others in this light. These peoples may have their own virtues and traditions, but they have no history with us. They are strangers.

If they want to rule us, they must conquer us the way the white man did—on the battlefield, by force of arms. That is the only honorable way for a warrior.

The white man seems to have lost his spirit, and we Indians see it. We see that he is giving this country away to others. And this fills our hearts with fear. For we are part of the land he is giving away. He is turning us over to strangers the way medieval barons turned over their serfs when they sold their land.

But we are not serfs. We are warriors. And we will not be ruled by people who have never fought us.

The white man must regain his warrior soul and take back his land.

In that fight, I will stand by his side and offer whatever strength I have to ensure his victory. Ha tu vi chat! *

* Comanche for, “It will all work out.”